-
Website
http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/ -
Original page
http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016563.php -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Math_Mage
351 comments · 15 points
-
Squid_Shark
742 comments · 67 points
-
unclesmrgol
1300 comments · 281 points
-
DayTrader
298 comments · 54 points
-
BurfordHolly
1038 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
In Iowa it is a caucus and you stand in a room and people can see how you vote based on what corner you stand in. Some whites want to show off by showing how progressive they are by voting for Obama.
In New Hampshire its a traditional secret ballot. That means white who told pollsters they were goign to vote for Obama are instead voting for Hillary because no one is watching.
7% of whites will lie and say they are voting for a black when they have no intention of doing so.
And Hillary? I'm going to assume that people voted for her despite the tears and not because of them. NH is not a real touchy-feely state.
It is however very white. Did this hurt Obama? Who knows. Since the pundits were so quick to point out that Obama won predominantly white Iowa as some sign that racism in America is finally on the wane, I wonder if that thought will be revised slightly now.
Unfortunately, NH's world-class severe climate scares people of ALL races away. As a result a full quarter of our population is of Canadian descent, as they are used to colder winters than we have. This is Florida to them!
It's not a melting pot (unless one counts French Canadians as a minority). And while I agree that it's not the kind of place where anyone would be likely to plant a burning cross on some black family's lawn, it's also not necessarily a place where people would feel the need to show how enlightened they are by voting for the black guy. Who's not only black but from Chicago of all places.
I would like to think that it is more of the tearing up thing, lieing to pollsters is more of a GOP thing then a Dem thing.
the case then only white women lie to pollsters because Obama carried white males
overwhelmingly.
NOOOOOOOOO................
I was glancing at the Concord NH newspaper's blog and saw some early returns, Clinton was leading in most of the reported results. Please don't let her out of the box, Obama supporters....
I live in the central part of NH, 2 miles from an Interstate highway and the major east-west State road in my region, but since I am in a neighborhood where the minimum lot size is 10 acres, my road has never been wired for cable, even though the town has had cable TV since 1979. There simply are not enough houses per road-mile to make it economically possible. Our local phone company Verizon seems to have no interest in putting better phone lines up here either.
To give you an idea of how bad it is, the cable ends 6/10 of a mile to my west, and 1 mile going the other way.
DirecTV has solved the cable teevee problem up here, but their satellite DSL cost is prohibitive.
If Hillary wins now after Bill's chafing, he can write a new book: To Shame A Nation.
Actually, he already could have written that.
Agreed. Lou is certainly a blow hard but I guess he serves a purpose.
CNN has had the fastest updates both on TV and online. The technology and interactive displays in their newsroom this election is just awesome. The other networks have a lot of catching up to do.
So ^ for Brads xcomment because I believe polls are often wrong.
LL
Oh well - maybe next time!
LL
NH Geography lesson-here are the "college towns" to look for results:
1. Hanover - Dartmouth College, dating back to the ancient years.
2. Durham-University of NH
3. Keene-Keene State Univerosty
4. Plymouth-Plymouth State Univeristy
5. New London-Colby College
6. Southern New Hampshire-a batch of assorted outfits like Franklin Pierce College, St. Anselm, Daniel Webster College (an aviation school), the southern branch of UNH, etc.
All dependents of the state, in one way or another. It is to be expected.
After years of saying I wouldn't vote for McCain (and weeks of saying I wouldn't vote for Huckabee), I decided today that if the Democrats nominate Hillary, I'll vote for whomever the Republicans put up.
Bill's recent performance in particular has reminded me how awful the Clintons are. Anything would be better than having them back at the center of our national political life, even electing such an arrogant authoritarian statist as McCain.
Having worked in the past for Dem machines in both MD and Chicago, I was immediately suspicious when I began to hear reports about polling stations running out of ballots. Perhaps the ballots had been already filled in. Or, perhaps some people are taking advantage of NH's permissive motor-voter law which has minimal requirements. Perhaps the FBI's voter fraud unit should send some snoops to NH.
chsw
You may not remember his speaches; heck, I don't. My dad told me how moving they were.
But I've heard them.
And that's what Obama sounds like... this is his concession speech for this part of the candidate selection process. He may not win now... but one day, he'll be powerful if he continues this.
He wants to end (not win) the war in iraq - where al Qaeda is taking a shit- kicking (from us and Iraqis). In the next sentence he says he wants to fight al Qaeda, as if he doesn't understand that if they are perceived as beating us in Iraq their ranks and coffers will swell.
The appeal is to people who have only superficial, if any, knowledge of Iraq . Given your previous posts Christoph I assume you are being sarcastic. Your post is too suble .
www.newsbusters.org
Now he is taking a high dive into the buttcrack of our illegal aliens by chanting “Yes we can!” Can what? Of course that is the English translation of “Si se Puede” which is what the illegals were chanting during their marches. He is telegraphing to the illegal aliens in this country that he is their guy.
This guy has a very questionable political history of radicalism that makes me think he is probably a Manchurian candidate. Read the Alinsky story over at American Thinker. There are a whole lot of facts there I've seen many other places that just don't add up.
On another note, I have to say this, whenever I hear, “we ran out of ballots, we have to get more” all over the state, that tells me that there is more than likely fraud in the air. In a state with such a low population, physically situated next to other places where an influx of phoney voting could come from, I would bet there were some shenanigans going on here somewhere. Democrats are famous for that stuff.
My last observation is this, regardless of the broom rider winning or not, it is fun to see the press backpeddling and stuttering because they were wrong. We need to see a lot more of this as they try to convince the American people who we are allowed to vote for.
Doesn't that sound a little suspicious? All they would need is 5 or 6 thousand fresh ballots to change the result from one Democrat to another...
NH has sunk in my book.
Saving Hillary's political ambition?
Something tells me, Democrats have made a huge mistake...
I am studying the union vote, and that slant has helped, so did crying...
But John McCain is something expected, however, in such a very liberal state, with the mass independent vote, it really seems to be another loss for Conservatives.
John McCain actually said Social Security was 'fixed' in the 80's, so he will be a great choice to fix it again.
He pushed Global Warming rhetoric...
The GOP is in huge trouble with an aged Senator like this...
NH has empowered Senators tonight, who oppose tax cuts...
Romney can attract votes from all over, and is in my book, without a doubt, the best opportunity for Conservative interests and sound experienced Management.
But I have seen the best not given a chance, and I expect we will be poorly served with Huckabee or McCain.
Nearly all of the polls said one Democrat would win New Hampshire. Nearly all of the polls were wrong. Which proves that polls can be wrong.
They were wrong about Obama winning New Hampshire.
But they could also be wrong about the percentage of Americans against the war in Iraq, Bush's job approval. etc.
And (horrors) they even could have been manipulated to give Bill Clinton higher job approval numbers than he really had. But I'm sure Clinton News Network (CNN) wouldn't stoop that low. After all, they were too busy protecting Saddam Hussein...
I am glad this whole money making tourist thing for NH is over. NH can now go back to what they do and are known for the other 3 years and 9 months between elections ... nothing.
I think your answer to Bush and the effect of the war were answered loudly during the previous election. There is no reason to doubt how Americans feel about Bush and this war.
I don't think this is a particularly difficult choice.