<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Captain's Quarters Comments - Latest Comments in Topless Woman Propositions Man In Park -- And Who Gets Arrested?</title><link>http://captainsquarters.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://captainsquarters.disqus.com/topless_woman_propositions_man_in_park_and_who_gets_arrested/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 18:13:38 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Topless Woman Propositions Man In Park -- And Who Gets Arrested?</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016463.php#comment-893369807</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sadly, most deranged people always seem to believe that they know how they would act under a certain circumstance, yet surprise themselves when they act in accordance with their nature. The law, by all attempts wishes to govern and condemn by denying human nature, yet refuse to own up when they act according to their own. We do not voluntarily pay to support hypocrisy; expecting ethical and beneficial judiciaries. It does not appear that such abilities even fall within the nature of law as we know it, so law forms a line. Outrage is ALWAYS warranted.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jackson Hounds</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 18:13:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Topless Woman Propositions Man In Park -- And Who Gets Arrested?</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016463.php#comment-893357749</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The problem is that by creating any type of scenario that offers a &lt;br&gt;opportunity that an individual would not normally come across IS &lt;br&gt;entrapment. Unless that individual wound NORMALLY go out of their way to&lt;br&gt; find such an opportunity it's a crime perpetrated by LAW, and hence law&lt;br&gt; needs answer for it's actions.  Since no in law believes they are &lt;br&gt;responsible to law, the law is acting criminal whenever and wherever it &lt;br&gt;can.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jackson Hounds</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 18:04:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Topless Woman Propositions Man In Park -- And Who Gets Arrested?</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016463.php#comment-110861</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Because ball sack is just wrong and not very pretty.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Patty</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 22:27:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Topless Woman Propositions Man In Park -- And Who Gets Arrested?</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016463.php#comment-110851</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My ex-husband was a firefighter and exposed himself to all of our neighbors.  In my opinion that is just what fireman do.  Nothing suprising there.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Patty</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 22:21:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Topless Woman Propositions Man In Park -- And Who Gets Arrested?</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016463.php#comment-86041</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, how nice of  the  cops  to  teach us  "life lessons" on taxpayer  money.&lt;br&gt;You mean, if  a pretty  young thing  comes up and chats me up&lt;br&gt;I better  run and  hide?  Whew! Thanks. I used to think it  was  better to &lt;br&gt;stick around and  chat and   enjoy the possibillities. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Yizmo Gizmo</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:28:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Topless Woman Propositions Man In Park -- And Who Gets Arrested?</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016463.php#comment-59534</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with you all,  I know someone who is in that park anywhere from 5 to 6 days a week and saw the whole thing go down.  The funny Part is that they are still wasting the taxpayers money by having undercover cars in the park.  I can spot the under cover car easily and that means so can the real pervs.  I feel that the columbus police deptartment is in the wrong and need to pay for the wrong doing that they did.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dora8777</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 14:00:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Topless Woman Propositions Man In Park -- And Who Gets Arrested?</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016463.php#comment-51439</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good point; ultimately men and women aren't equal in every single tiny respect, or we'd all have co-ed toilets and showers, etc.  Topless women are a huge excitement factor, even in liberal europe or canada (most porn focuses on that along with the other stuff).  Chances are, half the men are staring pretty hard at topless women where allowed, just for you ladies to ponder if considering it...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Parkwatcher</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 02:46:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Topless Woman Propositions Man In Park -- And Who Gets Arrested?</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016463.php#comment-51085</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Let me get something straight. It's legal for a woman to go topless in Columbus. It's probably also legal for a couple to kiss and embrace in public in Columbus. So is it legal for a man to caress the naked breasts of a topless woman? Or does touching them cross a line?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;After all, if the reason going topless is legal is because it is discriminatory, then they are claiming that there is no difference between a topless man or topless woman. If she can rub his chest in public, then he can probably rub hers.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MagicalPat</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 15:10:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Topless Woman Propositions Man In Park -- And Who Gets Arrested?</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016463.php#comment-50917</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is a clear-cut case of entrapment as the woman ASKED him to commit a crime, he didn't do it on his own volition.   By &lt;b&gt;asking&lt;/b&gt; him to expose Mr. Happy, she also committed a crime: criminal solicitation (a felony).  Without her direct &lt;b&gt;illegal&lt;/b&gt; solicitation, no crime would have taken place.  This is not crime prevention, it's crime invention.  That makes it entrapment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Why is it that the police can commit crimes like criminal solicitation, a violation of their pledge to uphold the law, without repercussions?  If it is illegal for me to solicit someone to commit a crime, how can it be legal for the police to do the same?  You can't uphold the law by breaking it, even with the best of intentions like getting criminals off the street.  When we allow the police to freely commit the very crimes they are suppose to enforce, the concept of law enforcement itself is destroyed.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ray_in_MPLS</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 12:04:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Topless Woman Propositions Man In Park -- And Who Gets Arrested?</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016463.php#comment-50916</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm actually much more interested in thr woman. How did the cops find her and what's her phone number?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mercutio</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 12:01:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Topless Woman Propositions Man In Park -- And Who Gets Arrested?</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016463.php#comment-50912</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sounds like it was set up specifically to catch a straight man in the act.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As a former Columbus resident, I'm pretty sure Berliner Park (near German Village) is a gay cruising area. I'm guessing most complaints to police were about gay public sex. After all, the story says, "based on video footage taken by cops who were targeting men having sex or masturbating in the park".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">The Scrutinator</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 11:58:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Topless Woman Propositions Man In Park -- And Who Gets Arrested?</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016463.php#comment-50902</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;"Any two-bit, ambulance-chaser, maggot lawyer should be able to make mince meat out of this charge, flip it to a major lawsuit with 80% contingency fees, and retire."&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I agree, a good lawyer should be able to get this man off quickly.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ray_in_MPLS</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 11:46:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Topless Woman Propositions Man In Park -- And Who Gets Arrested?</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016463.php#comment-50843</link><description>&lt;p&gt;and is the park any "cleaner" for this bust?  i doubt it.  This guy was not part of the problem they were allegedly trying to solve.  A waste of time and taxpayer dollars.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mmebrady</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 09:58:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Topless Woman Propositions Man In Park -- And Who Gets Arrested?</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016463.php#comment-50799</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The fireman's behavior is shameful but so is the police's. I think that the fireman should find out the name of the prostitute that solicited him and his defense should be to publish her name. Her children and grandchildren down to the fourth generation should know that she was a prostitute. The chief of police is her pimp and his children and  grandchildren should also know that he was a pimp or better yet a whoremonger.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aloysiusmiller</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 08:28:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Topless Woman Propositions Man In Park -- And Who Gets Arrested?</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016463.php#comment-50781</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Only at the urinal inside the public restroom.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ClydeS</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 07:26:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Topless Woman Propositions Man In Park -- And Who Gets Arrested?</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016463.php#comment-50777</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sounds more like Playboy Channel's "Totally Busted" to me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ClydeS</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 07:23:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Topless Woman Propositions Man In Park -- And Who Gets Arrested?</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016463.php#comment-50772</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very funny!!  A great defense, after all, she WAS smokin' hot!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cdor</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 07:14:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Topless Woman Propositions Man In Park -- And Who Gets Arrested?</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016463.php#comment-50766</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's got us as facinated as a deer in the &lt;i&gt;headlights&lt;/i&gt;, so to speak.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cybrludite</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 06:02:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Topless Woman Propositions Man In Park -- And Who Gets Arrested?</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016463.php#comment-50752</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ken... LOL!!  Hopefully, George isn't taking the same "wide stance"...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SwabJockey05</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 04:31:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Topless Woman Propositions Man In Park -- And Who Gets Arrested?</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016463.php#comment-50670</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Can I legally walk down the streets of Columbus with my breasts exposed?(okay, the guy probably would have giggled and kept walking or would have given me the name of a plastic surgeon)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Breasts are considered "junk" ,just  as was the man's privates...This is over the top, and I am thinking highly unethical if not illegal, all in the name of cleaning a park up...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Peejz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 00:56:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Topless Woman Propositions Man In Park -- And Who Gets Arrested?</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016463.php#comment-50604</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Get a room, dude!  And it sounds like the Columbus Police Department has way too much time on its hands.  Maybe the City Council should revisit the Department's staffing levels?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">quickjustice</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 23:11:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Topless Woman Propositions Man In Park -- And Who Gets Arrested?</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016463.php#comment-50562</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Garrison should not have done what he did . &lt;br&gt;Having said that we have a Mayor and city govt  that is HeJJ and gone over the left field fence. &lt;br&gt;The police chief is as old as dirt and about as effective as Geroge Carlin is couth .&lt;br&gt;That city resources were spent on this sting is not a surprise. &lt;br&gt;Mayor Coleman is a 'progressive' and insists that Columbus is a "safe" city and that we need to do more to combat "global warming."  In short the man is delusional .&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">WSG</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 21:28:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Topless Woman Propositions Man In Park -- And Who Gets Arrested?</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016463.php#comment-50556</link><description>&lt;p&gt;True, its just a bit awkward that the cops are using nudity and sexual comeones to target people for showing their naughty bits.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I would think those partaking of the right to expose themselves in public might find it a wee bit  hypocritcal using  their nudity to get someone busted for for exposing themselves. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jr565</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 21:19:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Topless Woman Propositions Man In Park -- And Who Gets Arrested?</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016463.php#comment-50529</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Flensor - Contrary to your stmt. Canada's federal and provincial legislatures do make the laws. In court cases involving discrimination suits for example, the Courts decision impacts and implores Parliament to adjust the laws accordingly.  This is a weighty issue now in Canada with the propensity of groups to access so-called human rights commissions and the courts. Parliaments are bound by these rulings to in fact rewrite the laws. Is it different in the USA?&lt;br&gt;from On the Right Coast&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">On the right coast</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 20:17:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Topless Woman Propositions Man In Park -- And Who Gets Arrested?</title><link>http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/016463.php#comment-50503</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Are you trying to tell me you CAN'T whip out Mr. Happy in a public park?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Talnik</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 19:37:21 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>